Covid Vaccines: by Dr. Wiley Smith

 

Discussions are underway in Christian circles on whether one should take a COVID-19 vaccine. The concern centers on association of the vaccines with tissue from aborted babies. Here is my opinion as a pro-life medical professional. I am a family physician and member of Grace Presbyterian Church PCA in Dalton, Georgia. My prior experience includes 24 years of active duty in the U.S. Army, 9 years of missionary work in Belize with Mission to the World, and my present role as a traveling medical missionary with Mission to the World. In past days, I was the board chairman for Crisis Pregnancy Center in Augusta, Georgia. Presently I am the medical supervisor for our local pro-life center, Women's Enrichment Center. Concerning vaccines and the immune system, I spent a year at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research studying experimental design and immunology.

Before describing the COVID-19 vaccines that are coming out, allow me to give a bit of biology lesson. Each of the billions of cells in our bodies contain genetic instructions in the form of DNA. The cells also contain a protein construction factory. The instructions for the protein construction factory on how to build proteins and other components are translated from DNA into another form called messenger RNA. Viruses such as COVID-19 hijack the protein construction factory by inserting their own, foreign RNA. The cells then busy themselves building new viruses, which break out of the cells and infect other cells. Viruses cannot reproduce themselves without invading normal cells.

The Lord has built into our bodies defenses against the viruses. Viruses have an outer coating of proteins. Our immune system can recognize these proteins as being foreign, and produce antibodies which coat and inactivate the virus. In the case of COVID-19, there is a protein called the spike protein that the virus uses to attach to our cells. We develop immunity to COVID-19 by developing antibodies to the spike protein. COVID-19, being very infectious and able to replicate quickly, is able to overcome our immune system before it has a chance to make effective antibodies, if we have never before been exposed to the virus.

There are three vaccines that have reached a stage to be widely distributed in the near future. These three vaccines all take a similar approach to teaching our immune systems how to make antibodies against the spike protein. The vaccines contain a short segment of messenger RNA which is specific for building only spike protein and nothing else associated with the COVID-19 virus. Entering some cells, the messenger RNA induces the cells to make copies of the spike protein. That protein is recognized by the body as being foreign, inducing the production of antibodies and giving us immunity. The messenger RNA does not make any alterations to cellular DNA. Neither does the messenger RNA remain active for very long.

Two of the vaccines, which are the ones that are on track for approval in the U.S., are almost identical in how they are manufactured and work. The Pfiser and Moderna vaccines are made with synthetically manufactured messenger RNA. This RNA is then coated with a capsule of lipids (fat) that allows the messenger RNA to enter cells. This is all done by synthetic machinery. There is nothing in the manufacturing process that involves tissues of aborted fetuses.

The third vaccine under consideration is the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine. This vaccine uses a different approach. Messenger RNA is inserted into the shell of a virus that causes colds in monkeys, but does not make us sick. The virus shell then allows the messenger RNA to enter our cells. Recall that viruses require the mechanisms of a living cell to reproduce. To reproduce the monkey cold virus, a human cell line called HEK 293 is used. These cells originated from the kidney of a fetus aborted in the 1970's. These cells have been modified so that they can reproduce themselves indefinitely, so that the cells used today are many generations away from the aborted fetus. No cells from recently aborted fetuses are involved. Fetus-derived cells are filtered out of the vaccine, so that no such cells enter us when administered.

So, those who do not wish to have anything to do with cells derived from aborted fetuses may wish to avoid the Oxford / AstraZeneca vaccine, but can take the Pfiser or Moderna vaccines with no such concern. It appears that the Pfiser and Moderna vaccines will be released first in the U.S.

There are other reasons we as Christians should seek out vaccination for COVID-19. I have heard a prediction that 450,000 Americans may die of COVID-19 by the end of February 2021. That is more Americans who died in the four years of World War II. The only way we can finally overcome COVID-19 is for enough of us to become immune so as to break the chain of transmission of the virus. If we wait until the virus infects the majority of us, millions would die. To be immunized and to develop immunity means that we care not only for ourselves, but for all others who bear the image of God.

Pregnant women who are infected by COVID-19 are at increased risk of severe complications and death, as are their unborn babies. If we care for them, we also have reason to be immunized.

 

A Man Born Blind

Do you remember the story in John about the man born blind in John 9? The story begins this way: “As He passed by, He saw a man blind from birth. And His disciples asked Him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he would be born blind?" Jesus answered, "It was neither that this man sinned, nor his parents; but it was so that the works of God might be displayed in him.” Jesus proceeds to heal this man. Recently I thought about Jesus’ statement and my personal judgements. I have always assumed that the way this man would display “the works of God” was in being healed. He was a canvas that God would paint with a great miracle. What if Jesus meant something far more profound?

                Psalm 139:14 declare that “I am fearfully and wonderfully made.” Was the blind man? Did God form his inward parts? Did God weave him together in his mother’s womb? We quickly respond, “Well, or course.” Really? Even in his blindness? What if Jesus’ statement about the blind man displaying the works of God were true even without the healing. What if he was born blind to display God’s works, even in his blindness?

                I have always assumed that all physical disabilities are a result of the fall. Without sin, they would never exist. This is inferred from Jesus statement that he came so that the blind would see and the lame would walk. And yet, I wonder. When Adam and Eve fell God promised broken relationships, pain in childbirth, futility in work and death. He did not say, your sons and daughters will now be blind, deaf, lame, or short. Is it possible that Jesus’ words regarding the blind man spoke of his magnificent value as an image-bearer of God even in his blindness? Is it possible that Jesus was reminding us that disabilities do not diminish our value at all? Could His words provide us with a model for how we see those who are not like us, or who are not like the “norm?” Before the fall, could a boy have fallen from a rock and broken his leg severely enough to walk with a limp? Could an accidental back swing of a hammer have taken out the eye of a man’s wife? (Remember, errors and accidents are not necessarily sinful).

                I am not yet convinced of my musing but I am intrigued. Regardless of where I ultimately land on this idea, I now see far greater value in those with disabilities than I did two weeks ago. I also see that God will display His works uniquely in each person’s life. Therefore, He will guide and direct our steps throughout “the days that were ordained for me.” (Psalm 139:16)

Governance

How would you govern a nation made up of people with different perspectives of what success looks like, different values, and different philosophical foundations?

·   Should those in power dictate what the rest of the nation must think?

·   Should the different groups denigrate one another with insults and insinuations of nefarious objectives?

·   Should those in the minority band together as an oppressed people?

·   Could such a nation find leaders capable of finding common ground who will give away some of the power of their group to serve those outside of power, promote goodwill among the differing groups and build a more peaceful nation?

 Having read the biographies of Washington, Adams, Hamilton, Burr, Jay, Monroe, and John Quincy Adams, I am convinced that the founder of the United States envisioned a nation whose leaders would work together instead of against one another. They were imperfect in their application of this principle, but it guided their service to our nation and laid a foundation that can sustain us today.

Election 2016 (replay)

 I wrote the following post after the election of 2016. While the names have changed, the basic ideas are just as needed today.

In Matthew 7:12, our Lord says, “In everything, therefore, treat people the same way you want them to treat you, for this is the Law and the Prophets.”  This is so important following the election results…from everyone.  President Trump has invited us to come together.  He offered some very kind words toward Mrs. Clinton thereby indicating that his rhetoric during the campaign was just that.  Secretary Clinton urged her supporters that they owe Mr. Trump an open mind.  These are good reminders, and I hope, more than just political speech.  Our population is divided in half between those who are pleased with the results and those who are disappointed.  How would you wish to be treated if you were on the other side?

            Today, I read posts from Trump supporters criticizing Clinton supporters who are protesting, even though Trump himself indicated that he would have protested had he lost.  On the other hand, Clinton supporters who criticized Trump for his willingness to only support the results if he won, are now declaring, “Not my president.”  That is not how our government works.  I would hope that believers would demonstrate compassionate understanding toward those who voted differently. 

The Trump supporters should be pleased.  It was unlikely that Mr. Trump would win.  His supporters believe deeply in many of the issues raised by Trump and long to see conservative ideals directing our nation.  Let them celebrate.  “Rejoice with those who rejoice.” Clinton supporters are deeply saddened.  The loss was a total surprise and they either supported a more progressive ideology or were offended by Trump’s rhetoric.  Let them grieve.  “Weep with those who weep.” 

The glory of God is at stake.  We are not Americans first.  We are the people of God.  What unites the Church is a love for Jesus Christ AND His people.  When we mock one another, we do not demonstrate the glory of God.  I hope that we can consider the emotions being felt by our brothers and sisters and demonstrate understanding and compassion.  We pray for our nation and our leaders so that the Gospel will spread and sinners will be saved.  Let’s not lose sight of our purpose.

"Lord, make me an instrument of thy peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love;
Where there is injury, pardon;
Where there is doubt, faith;
Where there is despair, hope;
Where there is darkness, light;
Where there is sadness, joy.

O Divine Master, grant that I may not so much seek
To be consoled as to console,
To be understood as to understand,
To be loved as to love;
For it is in giving that we receive;
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned;
It is in dying to self that we are born to eternal life."