“When Joseph saw Benjamin with them, he said to his
house steward, "Bring the men into the house, and slay an animal and make
ready; for the men are to dine with me at noon." So the man did as Joseph
said, and brought the men to Joseph's house. Now the men were afraid, because
they were brought to Joseph's house; and they said, ‘It is because of the money
that was returned in our sacks the first time that we are being brought in,
that he may seek occasion against us and fall upon us, and take us for slaves
with our donkeys.’” Genesis 43:16-18
Dick
Keyes writes in Seeing Through Cynicism, “Cynicism, as we use it today,
has to do with seeing through and unmasking positive appearances to reveal the
more basic underlying motivations of greed, power, lust, and selfishness.” Yesterday, President Obama presented a plan
for gun control. During his
presentation, his eyes filled with tears.
I noticed articles, written by opponents to gun-control, calling his
tears “crocodile tears”; implying that our president teared up only to sell his
idea. How do they know? Why would they assume this? Is it possible that President Obama, aware of
the number Americans who are killed each year with guns, is actually saddened
by that fact and he wants to help? We
may not agree with his solution, but that does not mean he is pretending.
My
state, Pennsylvania, does not have an approved budget. The state legislature presented a budget in
June that the Governor vetoed. This
impasse has meant that some charitable organizations who depend on public
funding are not receiving funds. Again
on Facebook, friends regularly malign the legislators, assuming that the
process is some sort of joke to them. Is
it possible that the legislature and the Governor are both taking stands on
principles that they believe are best for our state? This does not seem far-fetched to me.
This
brings me to the passage from Genesis 43, which reveals the problem of
cynicism. Joseph’s brothers, assumed
that he was planning to do them harm.
They did not trust the Egyptians.
Up until this point, Joseph had only treated them with kindness. Cynicism is not based—as some errantly assume—on
previous experience that teaches us to distrust. It is based in a fearful, faithless
determination to protect ourselves even if that means that we must ignore God’s
commands. The brothers assumed that
Joseph intended to harm them, when in reality, he planned to feast with
them. In their assumption, they maligned
Joseph’s character to one another, breaking what would one day be the ninth
commandment. Cynicism is not wise, but
diabolical, see Genesis 3:4-5.
What is
the solution? As is most often the case,
the solution is faith. Will I trust God
enough that I will not malign other people even if my assumption is right? Will I believe that it is better to endure
pain trusting that Jesus will comfort me, than to compromise God’s commands to
be safe (Matthew 5:4)? Will I follow
Jesus even when it is hard, or painful?
Dietrich Bonhoeffer was imprisoned for attempting an assassination of
Adolf Hitler. In his prison cell he
wrote to his parents, “Without trust, life is impoverished.” If ever a man had the right to the cynics
assumption, it would be a prisoner in Nazi Germany. However, this man of God recognized that
cynicism would rob him of joy. He was
unwilling to pay that price. May God
keep us from cynicism.
1 comment:
Excellent blog post, Vince! We tend to joke about cynicism but in reality this attitude destroys relationships. We presume others' motivations and react to those presumptions rather than discussing our thoughts. In using the example of Joseph and his brothers you show that this is nothing new.
Thank you for the reminder to check our thinking and to not be cynical!
Post a Comment